TM
Taylor Morrison Home Corp (TMHC)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered a clean top-line/EBITDA beat, with revenue $2.03B (+2% YoY) and EBITDA $304.8M versus S&P Global consensus revenue ~$1.93B and EBITDA ~$280M; diluted EPS of $1.92 was a slight miss versus ~$1.94 as higher spec mix and incentives compressed margin . Estimates noted with asterisk are from S&P Global.*
- Mix pivot toward spec homes (71% of sales; 65% of closings) supported volume but pressured gross margin (home closings GM 22.3%; adjusted 23.0%); management guides Q3 and likely Q4 GM to ~22% before FY adjusted ~23% .
- FY25 guidance largely maintained (13,000–13,500 closings; adjusted HC GM ~23%); notable adjustments: GAAP HC GM ~22.5% (now explicit), ACPU raised to $595–$600k, ending communities trimmed to ~350, buybacks lifted to at least $350M .
- Strategic optionality increased via a $3B Yardly build‑to‑rent financing facility with Kennedy Lewis, enhancing cash generation, balance sheet relief, and disposition flexibility over time -.
- Near‑term stock narrative catalyst: revenue/EBITDA beat vs EPS miss; sequential margin step‑down and elevated spec penetration into 2H vs stronger capital returns and BTR optionality could drive divergent reactions .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Revenue, EBITDA, and SG&A leverage: Total revenue grew 2% YoY to $2.03B, adjusted EBITDA margin held >16%, and SG&A fell 90 bps to 9.3% of home closings revenue .
- Pricing discipline and customer‑specific incentives sustained margins above peers: “Our overall bias between pace and price leans more heavily towards price, and ultimately margin and returns… The success of this approach is evident in our home closings gross margin.” — Sheryl Palmer .
- Strategic financing for Yardly: $3B facility with Kennedy Lewis broadens funding of land/development/vertical BTR costs, providing “balance sheet relief and greater optionality” on asset exits -.
What Went Wrong
- Orders and absorption softness: Net sales orders declined 12% YoY to 2,733; monthly absorption moderated to 2.6 vs 3.0; cancellations rose to 14.6% of gross orders (vs 9.4%) amid competitive incentives and macro confidence headwinds .
- Mix pressure on margins: Spec sales climbed to 71% (sales) and 65% (closings), compressing ASP and driving sequential GM moderation; Q3 GM guided to ~22% with Q4 likely similar given continued spec penetration and stable incentive assumptions .
- Community count trimmed: FY25 ending community count now ~350 vs prior at least 355, tempering the near‑term growth trajectory as management prioritizes returns/capital efficiency .
Financial Results
Core P&L vs prior year and prior quarter, with estimates
Notes: Asterisked estimates are from S&P Global. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown – home closings (Q2)
KPIs and balance sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our overall bias between pace and price leans more heavily towards price, and ultimately margin and returns… The success of this approach is evident in our home closings gross margin.” — Sheryl Palmer (CEO) .
- “Adjusted home closings gross margin… was 23%, in line with our prior guidance… we expect Q3 home closings gross margin to be approximately 22%… We expect our full year adjusted home closings gross margin to be approximately 23%.” — Curt VanHyfte (CFO) .
- “Spec sales increased… to a new high of 71%… With specs carrying gross margins below that of to-be-built homes, we expect this temporary mix shift will impact… margin in the third and fourth quarter.” — Sheryl Palmer .
- “We have executed a flexible finance facility… covering total project costs of $3 billion… to enhance cash generation, balance sheet relief, and greater optionality” (Yardly BTR) — Erik Heuser (CCOO) and press release .
- “Our one‑of‑a‑kind digital sales environment… continues to gain traction and support our healthy SG&A structure.” — Sheryl Palmer .
Q&A Highlights
- Spec mix and margin cadence: Higher spec penetration to persist near term; Q3 GM guided ~22% and Q4 likely similar depending on rates/incentives; FY adjusted ~23% intact .
- Yardly $3B facility mechanics: Functions akin to land bank; serves existing and new assets; provides timing flexibility to optimize exit value; some existing assets may move, impact ramps over coming quarters -.
- Pace vs price thresholds: Will flex by submarket; patient on irreplaceable core assets; long‑term paces in low 3s; Q2 pace impacted by specific Esplanade timing issues .
- Cost backdrop: Acquisition terms softening modestly; development inflation trending to low single digits; improved access to trades .
- Demand/ASP color: Order ASP down from mix/geography/specs; Indianapolis ramping with lower price points; resort lifestyle resilient with strong option/lot premiums (~$270k combined) .
- Cancellations: Up to 14.6% driven by home‑to‑sell, relocations, and competitive incentives; deposits generally retained unless contingencies apply (with re‑apply option within 12 months) -.
Estimates Context
Notes: Asterisked estimates are from S&P Global. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Implication: Street likely raises revenue/EBITDA for FY while trimming near‑term margin cadence and EPS given sustained spec mix and stable incentive assumptions .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat on revenue/EBITDA with a modest EPS miss; the mix‑driven GM step‑down should keep near‑term EPS contained despite volume resilience .
- Management is prioritizing margin/returns over pace; spec penetration remains elevated through year‑end, keeping Q3/Q4 GM near ~22% before normalizing longer‑term .
- FY guide intact on units and adjusted margin; community count trimmed and GAAP HC GM clarified at ~22.5% reflects prudent stance amid competition and incentives .
- $3B Yardly financing adds capital‑light growth and exit optionality; watch for asset transfers and cash flow benefits to build over coming quarters -.
- Orders softness and higher cancellations point to macro sentiment vs borrower health; tailored financing (e.g., 3.75% 7/1 ARM) remains an effective lever .
- Regional mix is a swing factor: East/Orlando strong; Tampa soft; Bay Area stable; SoCal intentionally smaller — monitor new Esplanade openings (e.g., Summerlin) for mix/margin support -.
- Capital returns are a support: ≥$350M buybacks targeted in FY25; diluted shares ~101M FY/100M in Q3 — accretive to EPS and ROE .
Appendix: Additional Data Points
- Q2 2025 Total Revenue composition: Home closings $1.966B; Financial services $52.9M; Amenity/other $10.6M; Land closings $0.4M .
- Balance sheet at 6/30/25: Cash $130M; Total assets $9.45B; Equity $6.06B; Net HB debt/cap 22.9% .
- Land activity: Q2 land spend $612M (43% development); 85,051 lots owned/controlled; 60% optioned/off‑balance‑sheet; ~6.4 years supply (2.6 owned) .
Estimates in the report marked with an asterisk are Values retrieved from S&P Global.